Jul 202003
 

Martin Strohal is webmaster and co-founder of Delphi-Source.de, the largest (and possibly best) German-speaking Delphi site in the world. Sehr gut! Martin and I recently had a email chat about Delphi 8 and Delphi for .NET which he digested into an article. As my German is a little rusty, I’m hoping to persuade him to […]

Jul 192003
 

With some code massaging to take platform differences into account, yes, Delphi components written for Win32 can work in .NET. Most components live “closer to the metal” than application code, so you should expect VCL components to require more work to port to .NET than Delphi application code. The amount of work required to port […]

Jul 192003
 

Yes, Linux is still a target platform for Borland. Long live Kylix, and long live JBuilder. Kylix is a long term investment for Borland just as JBuilder was a long term investment in its infancy. We don’t expect to see overnight financial success from a market that is still in the “emergence” phase. When the […]

 Comments Off on Is Linux still a target platform for Borland in the next couple of years?  Tagged with: , , ,
Jul 182003
 

Itanium is orders of magnitude more difficult to gen for than AMD 64. That means Borland product management will need to see orders of magnitude more customers wielding pitchforks and cash demanding native Itanium codegen. I would love to take a crack at AMD-64. ‘Twould be a piece of cake and a pleasure compared to […]

Jul 182003
 

In a word: no. CMOVcc had potential when it was introduced in the Pentium Pro, but it is now completely useless. Based on empirical observation I’m guessing that the Pentium III and Pentium IV chips have shoved CMOVcc off the core processor into glacial pipeline-blocking microcode because the execution performance of CMOVcc on modern processors […]

 Comments Off on Will the Delphi compiler be updated to use CMOVcc instructions to reduce execution delays caused by branching?  Tagged with: , ,